Pedestrian Safety Analysis in Mixed Traffic Conditions Using Video Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the dramatic development of image processing technology, a growing number of traffic flow detection and analyses have been conducted by using video data. Time to collision (TTC) and postencroachment time (PET) are two major parameters used to indicate the severity of a potential collision and to capture an imminent vehicular accident. However, microlevel pedestrian-involved collisions are less studied because they are hard to observe or record. This paper tries to extract the traffic object locations from video data, to define the time difference to collision (TDTC) parameter as a variation from TTC and PET to fit the pedestrian-involved potential collisions/conflicts, analyze the interaction behavior between pedestrian and vehicles, and validate the TDTC parameter in indicating pedestrian safety performance by using 100 groups of interaction data. The results show that the interaction cases with larger TDTC values are safer, whereas the cases with continuously closer to zero TDTC values are more dangerous. About 80% of the cases classified by the TDTC parameter have the same result with the independent observation; if TDTC is combined with vehicle speed, the classification result can be improved. More mixed traffic scenes will be conducted based on this research in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it