MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976840393 · doi:10.1071/rdv25n1ab248

248 DISTRIBUTION OF OVULATION-INDUCING FACTOR IN MALE REPRODUCTIVE TISSUES OF LLAMAS

2012· article· en· W1976840393 on OpenAlexaffabout
O. A. Bogle, Jaswant Singh, Gregory P. Adams

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSperm and Testicular Function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyEpididymisEndocrinologyInternal medicineOvulationAmpullaSubmucosaVas deferensEpitheliumAndrologySpermAnatomyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have recently reported that the ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) in seminal plasma is the well-conserved neurotrophin, nerve growth factor. This protein has been identified in the ejaculates of a variety of species using both in vivo and in vitro bioassays. The role of OIF in the ejaculate is evident in camelids. Irrespective of whether a male is intact or vasectomised, ejaculation of this protein during copulation stimulates an increase in circulating LH in the female, which subsequently leads to ovulation. The purpose for OIF in species that are spontaneous ovulators, however, remains unclear. We hypothesise that OIF production is restricted to the secretory epithelium of accessory glands of the male, specifically the prostate gland, because of its conservation among mammals. The objective of the present study was to determine the sites of OIF secretion in the llama that contribute to high concentrations found in the ejaculate. The mucosa, submucosa, and muscularis layers of the reproductive organs (testis, epididymis, ductus deferens, and penis) and accessory sex glands (ampulla, prostate gland, and bulbourethral gland) from mature male llamas (n = 2) were probed with polyclonal rabbit anti-nerve growth factor. The secondary antibody used was horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G. The distribution and intensity of OIF-secreting cells were identified and compared among tissues using a four-point scale. The quantity of OIF detected was highest in mucosal prostatic cells. The protein was strongly localised in the apical region of epithelial cells and frequently found within the glandular lumen. The seromucus-secreting epithelium of ampullary glands showed no reaction to OIF, whereas the bulbourethral gland epithelium showed an intermediate response. The presence of OIF was not detected in the epithelium of the penile urethra, epididymis (caput, corpus, or cauda), or seminiferous tubules. A diffuse distribution of the protein was, however, detected in the stroma of the testes, epididymides, and accessory glands. We conclude that cells that secrete OIF are distributed unequally among accessory sex glands in llamas. The bulk of OIF is produced by the prostate gland, with minimal to no contributions by the bulbourethral and ampullary glands. Future studies involve species comparisons and relating the size of the prostate gland to the concentration of OIF within an ejaculate. Research supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicSperm and Testicular FunctionFrench-language works237,207