MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976860473 · doi:10.1096/fj.02-0158rev

Analysis of paradoxical observations on the association between leptin and insulin resistance

2002· review· en· W1976860473 on OpenAlexaff
Rolando B. Ceddia, Heikki A. Koistinen, Juleen R. Zierath, Gary Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeptinInsulin resistanceInternal medicineEndocrinologyInsulinDiabetes mellitusObesityMediatorGlucose homeostasisLeptin receptorLipoatrophyHormoneHomeostasisMedicineBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is commonly associated with the development of insulin resistance and diabetes in humans and rodents. Insulin resistance and diabetes are observed in lipoatrophic individuals or rodent models of lipoatrophy. Here we focus on the role of leptin, the product of the obesity (ob) gene, in the development of insulin resistance and diabetes associated with obesity and lipoatrophy. We review the reported effects of leptin on whole body glucose metabolism and compare and contrast these with direct effects on skeletal muscle, fat and liver. This summary of paradoxical observations on the effects of leptin on glucose homeostasis and the ability of leptin to induce or improve insulin resistance suggests that a complex interplay exists between direct peripheral and centrally mediated effects of the hormone. Evidence suggesting that leptin acts as a mediator of insulin release from pancreatic beta cells is reviewed. Finally, intracellular signaling mechanisms stimulated by both leptin and insulin are discussed, with potential points of cross-talk suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations258
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207