MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976864800 · doi:10.1039/b814388a

Describing chemical transformations in multiple spiking isotope dilution: fundamental aspects and definitions

2008· article· en· W1976864800 on OpenAlexaff
Juris Meija, Laurent Ouerdane, Zoltán Mester

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Analyst · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotope dilutionTerminologyDilutionComputer scienceChemistryMass spectrometryBiological systemBiochemical engineeringThermodynamicsChromatographyPhysicsEngineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Currently, several mathematical methods exist to address simultaneous species formation and degradation using multiple spiking isotope dilution mass spectrometry. While all of these strategies have been compared numerically, comparison of the underlying principles is lacking. Owing to recent interest in using the species inter-conversion factors, mainly to study the quality of analytical methods, this manuscript reviews the mathematical logic and inconsistencies of the existing double or triple spiking isotope dilution models. Systematic terminology is also introduced to clarify the species inter-conversion coefficient definitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe AnalystSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207