MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976881220 · doi:10.1142/s0129156408005473

STANDOFF DETERMINATION OF BIOAEROSOL SIZE BASED ON DOUBLE SCATTERING MEASUREMENT WITH MFOV LIDAR: CONCEPT AND NUMERICAL SIMULATION

2008· article· en· W1976881220 on OpenAlex
G. Roy, Luc Bissonnette

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLidarBioaerosolScatteringRemote sensingVisibilityExtinction (optical mineralogy)OpticsRange (aeronautics)WavelengthLight scatteringParticle (ecology)RangingEnvironmental scienceAerosolPhysicsMaterials scienceMeteorologyGeographyGeologyGeodesy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We investigate the use of multiple scattering via Multiple-Field-Of-View (MFOV) lidar signals to characterize bioaerosol particles size and concentration from ground based lidar over distances shorter than a few kilometers. The MFOV lidar signal is calculated for background aerosols at a wavelength 355 nm for a visibility of 30 km. The optical depths studied are small and the calculations are restricted to second order scattering. Also since background aerosols are constituted of relatively small particles which diffuse the light at large angles, the fields of view (FOV) range from 1 to 100 mrad full angle. We show that the MFOV lidar measurements contain exploitable information on particle size and extinction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.066
Threshold uncertainty score0.350

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it