MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976907596 · doi:10.1007/s10995-006-0102-2

Ensuring the Safe and Effective Use of Medications During Pregnancy: Planning and Prevention Through Preconception Care

2006· review· en· W1976907596 on OpenAlexaff
Janet D. Cragan, Jan M. Friedman, Lewis B. Holmes, Kathleen Uhl, Nancy Green, Laura E. Riley

Bibliographic record

VenueMaternal and Child Health Journal · 2006
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePublic healthPregnancyFamily medicineMedical emergencyIntensive care medicineEnvironmental healthNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Whether to use a medication during pregnancy can be a concern for both women and health care providers. It has been estimated that up to 10% of congenital anomalies may be caused by environmental exposures–that is, exposures to medications, alcohol, or other exogenous factors that have adverse effects on the developing embryo or fetus [1]. Avoiding all potentially adverse exposures can prevent these adverse effects. However, it is not always possible to avoid taking medications during pregnancy. Women who are pregnant continue to experience short-term and long-term health conditions that must be managed. Discontinuing treatment of a serious condition when a woman becomes pregnant can have profound, long-term implications both for her health and that of her baby. In a retrospective study from eight health maintenance organizations, researchers estimated that approximately 59% of pregnant women were prescribed a medication other than a vitamin or mineral supplement at some time during pregnancy [2]. Use of over-the-counter medications during pregnancy may be even higher, and many women take a dietary or herbal supplement other than multivitamins or folic acid while pregnant [3, 4]. Preconception care provides the opportunity to optimize a woman’s use of medications in preparation for pregnancy. Such care includes identifying patterns of medication use before pregnancy occurs; adjusting those patterns to avoid the use of nonessential medications; minimizing exposure to medications known to be harmful to the embryo or fetus; and adjusting the dose, route of administration, and timing of essential treatments to optimize maternal health at each stage of pregnancy while safeguarding the embryo, fetus, and infant. In this paper, we summarize the basic principles of teratology and the current state of knowledge about the effects of medication use during pregnancy; outline basic components of preconception care that can help minimize the risk of birth defects; and provide examples of approaches to planning for the safe and effective use of medications during pregnancy through preconception care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaternal and Child Health JournalSame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207