Synthesis and Proton Conductivity of Partially Sulfonated Poly([vinylidene difluoride-<i>c</i><i>o</i>-hexafluoropropylene]-<i>b</i>-styrene) Block Copolymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of novel, amphiphilic block copolymers comprising of sulfonated poly([vinylidene difluoride - co -hexafluoropropylene] - b -styrene) [P(VDF - co -HFP) - b -SPS] were synthesized. The number-average molecular weights of the fluorous and polystyrene segments were 17 900 and 8100 g/mol, respectively. Sulfonation of the polystyrene segment to different extents provided a series of polymers which were cast into films to yield proton exchange membranes with varying ion exchange capacity (IEC). Proton conductivity of the membranes increased significantly when the IEC was increased from 0.5 to 1.2 mmol/g. For 0.9−1.2 mmol/g IEC membranes, the conductivity was similar to Nafion 117, significantly higher than random copolymers of polystyrene and sulfonated polystyrene, and twice that of nonfluorous block copolymer membranes based on sulfonated poly(styrene - b -[ethylene- co -butylene] - b -styrene) (S-SEBS) and sulfonated hydrogenated poly(butadiene - b -styrene) (S-HPBS) copolymers. TEM revealed a disruption in ordered morphology with increasing degree of sulfonation. Morphological structures of membranes having 0.6−1.2 mmol/g IEC comprised of interconnected networks of ion channels, each of 8−15 nm width.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".