The acute affective response of Type A Behaviour Pattern individuals to competitive and noncompetitive exercise.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'exercice a des effets prononces benefiques sur l'humeur; cependant, pour les individus ayant un comportement de type A les effets positifs de l'exercice sur l'humeur peuvent ne pas etre uniformes compte tenu de leur tendance a percevoir les situations d'exercice comme etant une competition. Cette etude a examine si la competition (et l'effort qui s'ensuit) influence la reaction affective des individus ayant un comportement de type A lorsqu'ils font de l'exercice. Les resultats indiquent que les individus ayant un comportement de type A qui font de l'exercice dans une condition competitive ont une reaction affective moins favorable que ceux dans une condition non competitive. Les effets sont les plus apparents pour l'affect general, la depression et la colere et moins notables pour l'anxiete chronique. Il y a une tendance pour les individus ayant un comportement de type A dans la condition non competitive a manifester des benefices affectifs tandis que l'affect de ceux dans la condition competitive ont tendance a ne pas etre influences par l'exercice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".