MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976986223 · doi:10.1063/1.3696216

RXTE/PCA observations of Hercules X-1: New features of the orbital and 35-day folded light curves

2012· article· en· W1976986223 on OpenAlexaff
D. A. Leahy, Ciprian D. Igna

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLight curveOrbital periodNeutron starAccretion discLine-of-sightSkyOrbital inclinationAstronomySatelliteAccretion (finance)Binary numberStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hercules X-1 is a well-known and much studied X-ray binary. It is a 1.7 day eclipsing system and has a 35-day cycle consisting of consecutive high, low, short-high and low states. The cause of the cycle is understood to be changing obscuration of the line-of-sight to the neutron star by a warped accretion disk, which precesses with a 35 day period. All of the X-ray observations of Hercules X-1 taken with the Proportional Counter Array (PCA) instrument of the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) satellite are analyzed. 35-day phase is determined using a study of RXTE All Sky Monitor data and verified with the PCA data. New orbital and 35-day folded light curves are presented. Absorption dips are identified and studied as a function of orbital and 35-day phase. The extensive RXTE/PCA data give a considerably better and different picture of the dip phenomena than previously possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedings→Same topicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations→French-language works237,207→