MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976993877 · doi:10.1093/library/10.2.208

<i>The Earliest Books of Canterbury Cathedral: Manuscripts and Fragments to c. 1200</i> . By R <scp>ichard</scp> G <scp>ameson</scp> . <i>The Earliest Books of Canterbury Cathedral: Manuscripts and Fragments to c. 1200</i> . By GamesonRichard. London: The Bibliographical Society and The British Library. 2008. 414 pp. £60. <scp>isbn</scp> 978 0 948170 166 (Bib. Soc.); 978 0 7123 5008 2 (BL).

2009· article· en· W1976993877 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Library · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClassicsHistoryArtLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article The Earliest Books of Canterbury Cathedral: Manuscripts and Fragments to c. 1200. By Richard Gameson. Get access The Earliest Books of Canterbury Cathedral: Manuscripts and Fragments to c. 1200. By Richard Gameson. London: The Bibliographical Society and The British Library. 2008. 414 pp. £60. isbn978 0 948170 166 (Bib. Soc.); 978 0 7123 5008 2 (BL). Alexander Andrée Alexander Andrée Toronto Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Library, Volume 10, Issue 2, June 2009, Pages 208–210, https://doi.org/10.1093/library/10.2.208 Published: 24 June 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.279
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it