Performance of a Longitudinal Circular-to-Slot Gas Turbine Exhaust Duct With a 90 Degree Bend
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In some gas turbine applications, it is desirable to redirect the exhaust flow through 90 degrees and mix this flow with the ambient air for the purposes of structural integrity and heat signature suppression. A method to achieve this is to transform the flow from a circular profile to a rectangular slot of high aspect ratio. The increase in wetted perimeter allows for greater mixing with the ambient air; however the shape of such a duct causes significant amounts of flow distortion and poor pressure recovery. This paper presents preliminary experimental results of the performance of such a duct and discusses the ability of a commercial CFD software package to numerically predict this performance. Significant crossflows and reversed flows were observed at the duct outlet leading to inefficient use of the outlet area, high back pressure and consequently a high loss coefficient. These trends are exacerbated with an increasing inlet swirl angle. The preliminary numerical predictions captured the general trends of the flow but could not capture the extent of the reversed flow, leading to over-prediction of the effective area ratio, E, and under-prediction of the loss coefficient, k.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".