MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977055260 · doi:10.1042/bse0450177

Sensitivity analysis: from model parameters to system behaviour

2008· review· en· W1977055260 on OpenAlex
Brian Ingalls

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEssays in Biochemistry · 2008
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene Regulatory Network Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)Parametrization (atmospheric modeling)Interpretation (philosophy)Set (abstract data type)Range (aeronautics)Computer scienceUncertainty analysisEconometricsBiological systemMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsSimulationBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sensitivity analysis addresses the manner in which model behaviour depends on model parametrization. Global sensitivity analysis makes use of statistical tools to address system behaviour over a wide range of operating conditions, whereas local sensitivity analysis focuses attention on a specific set of nominal parameter values. This narrow focus allows a complete analytical treatment and straightforward interpretation in the local case. Sensitivity analysis is a valuable tool for model construction and interpretation, and can be applied in medicine and biotechnology to predict the effect of interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.507
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it