Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Evidence from retrospective studies suggests that regional anesthesia reduces the risks of major complications associated with carotid endarterectomy compared with general anesthesia, namely: stroke, stroke/death, death and myocardial infarction. RECENT FINDINGS: A superficial cervical plexus block is the regional anesthetic technique of choice. It is as efficacious as a combined (superficial and deep) cervical plexus block and carries substantially less risk of inducing a life-threatening complication from the block placement than a cervical epidural or a deep cervical plexus block. Lidocaine, mepivacaine, bupivacaine and ropivacaine are all suitable agents for this block but bupivacaine provides the longest duration of postoperative analgesia. The addition of epinephrine 1: 300,000 (3.75 microg/ml) reduces maximal blood concentrations of lidocaine and bupivacaine without inducing any adverse hemodynamic effects. SUMMARY: The anesthesiologist should learn how to place a superficial cervical plexus block. The technique is easy to master, effective and carries a low risk of inducing a serious complication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".