MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation of Residual and Actual Stress Levels of Steel Columns in Existing Building Structures due to Working Loads

2006· article· en· W1977076469 on OpenAlexaff
Hyo Seon Park, W.H. Lee, Ki-Ho Yun, Hong C. Rhim

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Load-Bearing Analysis
Canadian institutionsAlpha Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidual stressStructural engineeringResidualFinite element methodColumn (typography)Stress (linguistics)Measure (data warehouse)Materials scienceEngineeringComputer scienceComposite materialAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wide variety of residual stress measurement methods can be used to measure the axial stress in a column. One of the most widely used techniques for measuring residual stress is slotting method since it is relatively simple and cost-effective to implement at vertical columns in field. However, the slotting method is considered to be semi-destructive or destructive method depending on the amount of material to be removed. Therefore, in this paper, optimal depth of slots for measuring actual stress is presented to minimize the amount of material to be removed. Finite element method is used to estimate the minimum depth of the slot in H-shaped steel column. By performing actual saw cutting, optimality of the simulated depth of the slot is investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKey engineering materialsSame topicStructural Load-Bearing AnalysisFrench-language works237,207