MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977080227 · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00010

Dissecting Altered Functional Engagement in TBI and Other Patient Groups through Connectivity Analysis: One Goal, Many Paths (A Response to Hillary)

2012· article· en· W1977080227 on OpenAlexaff
Gary R. Turner, Anthony R. McIntosh, Brian Levine

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Systems Neuroscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of TorontoYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional connectivityFront (military)NeurosciencePsychologyCognitive psychologyComputer scienceCognitive sciencePhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

GENERAL COMMENTARY article Front. Syst. Neurosci., 07 March 2012 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.067
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.067
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0040.004
Research integrity0.0240.052
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Systems NeuroscienceSame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207