MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977131938 · doi:10.1109/ecce.2013.6647116

The minor hysteresis loop under rotating magnetic fields in machine laminations

2013· article· en· W1977131938 on OpenAlexafffund
Natheer Alatawneh, Pragasen Pillay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaConcordia University
KeywordsHarmonicsMinor (academic)Magnetic hysteresisMagnetic fieldHarmonic analysisElectrical steelWaveformAcousticsHarmonicHysteresisMagnetic fluxMaterials scienceMechanicsPhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectronic engineeringMagnetizationVoltageCondensed matter physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In rotating AC machines, the saturated flux density waveforms contain harmonics, which create minor hysteresis loops. The minor hysteresis loop in machine laminations causes a serious challenge in core loss estimation, especially under rotating magnetic fields. This paper highlights the problem of harmonics in rotating field and its effect on the core loss estimation. In addition, the behavior of minor loops under rotating fields is compared with the minor loops under pulsating fields. Measurements were carried out on a non oriented silicon steel sample of M36G29 with different fundamental frequencies of interest to the industry, 60 Hz and 400 Hz, with consideration of the third harmonic at each frequency. A novel design of magnetizing test fixture based on an electromagnetic Halbach array is used to perform these measurements. Results are presented and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207