Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’étude des mouvements d’action catholique spécialisée permetde mettre en relief l’émergence progressive de la jeunesse comme groupe socialorganisé à partir des années 1930. L’analyse du discours et des revendicationsde l’un de ces mouvements, la Jeunesse ouvrière catholique féminine (JOCF),permet en effet d’identifier les bases à partir desquelles ces associations vontrevendiquer l’inscription des besoins et des priorités des jeunes à l’agenda desdébats sociaux. En valorisant l’origine sociale des jeunes, en tablant sur la nonmixitédes mouvements et la responsabilité des laïcs, ces mouvements constituentnon seulement une voie privilégiée où se structure une jeunesse organisée,mais aussi un terreau favorable à l’émergence de l’hétérogénéité de cette mêmejeunesse. L’analyse des orientations de la Fédération des mouvements dejeunesse du Québec, un organisme qui se structure à la fin des années 1940afin de représenter les diverses associations de jeunes, confirme l’existence dece double processus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".