MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977192375 · doi:10.1159/000232704

Isolation of a Low Molecular Weight Constituent from Kentucky Blue Grass Pollen Possessing Carrier Activity of High Molecular Weight Constituent(s)

2009· article· en· W1977192375 on OpenAlexaff
A.K.M. Ekramoddoullah, F.T. Kisil, A.H. Sehon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAllergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSize-exclusion chromatographyChemistryPollenImmunoglobulin EBiochemistryAntibodyIn vitroGlycoproteinImmunologyMolecular biologyChromatographyBiologyBotanyEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An immunologically active fraction, designated as C-I-3 was isolated from the dialysate of the aqueous extract of defatted Kentucky Blue Grass pollen by differential dialysis and gel filtration. This fraction was shown to consist of a glycoprotein with a molecular size corresponding to 4,800 daltons and with a pI value of 3.6, and to contain all amino acids except cysteine. The intraperitoneal administration of C-I-3 in saline into mice or rats prior to their immunization with the nondialyzable constituents of the aqueous extract of Kentucky Blue Grass (i.e., the retentate, R) in presence of Al(OH)3 resulted in the enhanced production of anti-R IgE antibodies. The enhancement of the anti-R murine IgE response was shown in adoptive cell transfer experiments to be due to the generation of R-specific T helper cells. Hence, it is suggested that the structural elucidation of C-I-3 may prove useful in establishing the nature of carrier determinant(s) of the major allergenic components of Kentucky Blue Grass pollen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Archives of Allergy and Applied ImmunologySame topicAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFrench-language works237,207