MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977213604 · doi:10.1117/12.488024

<title>Nonrecursive and recursive methods for parameter estimation in filtering problems</title>

2003· article· en· W1977213604 on OpenAlexaff
Michael A. Kouritzin, Hongwei Long, Xinjian Ma, Wei Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemParticle filterRecursive least squares filterComputer scienceRecursive Bayesian estimationEstimation theoryRecursive filterAlgorithmFilter (signal processing)State (computer science)Identification (biology)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsApplied mathematicsControl theory (sociology)Adaptive filterDigital filterArtificial intelligenceBayesian probability

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nonlinear filtering is an important and effective tool for handling estimation of signals when observations are incomplete, distorted, and corrupted. Quite often in real world applications, the signals to be estimated contain unknown parameters which need to be determined. Herein, we develop and analyze non-recursive and recursive methods, which can deal with combined state and parameter estimation for nonlinear partially-observed stochastic systems. For the non-recursive method, we obtain the unknown parameters through solving a system of non-singular finite order linear equations. For the recursive method, we generalize the least squares method and develop a particle prediction error identification algorithm so that it can be applied to general nonlinear stochastic systems. We use the branching particle filter to do the signal state estimation and implement simulations for both methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207