Abstract A55: A first-in-human, phase I study of an oral hedgehog pathway antagonist, BMS-833923 (XL139), in subjects with advanced or metastatic solid tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: The hedgehog pathway is dysregulated in basal cell carcinoma, medulloblastoma, pancreatic, lung, gastric, and a variety of other cancers. BMS-833923 is a potent, oral, small molecule antagonist of hedgehog signaling. Methods: Subjects with advanced or metastatic solid tumors were enrolled into a multiple ascending dose study to identify a maximum tolerated dose and evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics of BMS-833923. All subjects receive a single dose one week prior to continuous daily dosing. The single dose window allows for single dose PK collection for one week. To identify the pharmacologically active dose range surrogate tissue was collected prior to Day 1 and again on Day 22 of the first cycle. Results: As of August 14, 2009 sixteen subjects have been treated at four dose levels: 30 mg (n=5), 60 mg (n=3), 120 mg (n=3), and 240 mg (n=5); with mean patient age of 56 (range 21–78) and ECOG performance 0–1. No subjects in the first three dose cohorts experienced drug-related CTCAE AEs greater than Grade 2. One subject with medulloblastoma in the 30 mg dose cohort continues on study for more than 10 months with stable disease. Treatment of patients in the fourth cohort at 240 mg continuous daily dosing is still on-going. In this cohort one subject experienced drug-related CTCAE Grade 2 lipase elevation and pancreatitis that quickly resolved when drug was withheld. This subject has a diagnosis of Gorlin Syndrome, which is caused by germline mutations in the hedgehog pathway genes Patched or Smoothened. This subject experienced a partial response (PR) that is still ongoing. BMS-833923 PK properties showed dose proportionality between the 30, 60, and 120 mg dose cohorts with a Cmax of 30 ng/ml, 56 ng/ml and 102 ng/ml respectively. The terminal half-life was greater than 7 days and drug accumulations were observed. Conclusion: BMS-833923 is generally well tolerated at daily doses of 30, 60, 120 mg. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A55.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".