The Investigation of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Effect on Growth and Nutrients in Trifolium pratense in The Multi Metals Contaminated Soil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two pot culture experiments were carried out to study the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on the growth and nutrients uptake of Trifolium pratense. In first pot experiment, efficiency of four mycorrhizal strains: Glomus mosseae; Glomus etanicatum; Glomus intraradices and mixed strains (combination of Glomus mosseae, Gigaspora hartiga and Glomus fasciculatum), on the uptake of nutrients was investigated. Results showed that Glomus mosseae had the highest efficiency of uptake, translocation and distribution of P, N and dry matter in alfalfa in comparison with the other strains. It can confirm existence of differences in ability of mycorrhizal strains in uptake and transport P into the shoot. A second experiment with heavy metal contaminated soil (Cd, Co, Pb and combinations) and inoculation to Glomus mosseae was executed. In this trial, uptake of nutrients depends on kind and mixture of metals was varied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".