Empirical modelling of the isothermal transformation of pearlite in hypereutectoid steel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rate controlling mechanism for pearlite growth in a hypereutectoid steel composition was examined through an analysis of the microstructural characteristics of the pearlite structure, namely interlamellar spacing, for different isothermal transformation and austenitising conditions. From a metallographic analysis of the pearlite structure as a function of the austenitisation and undercooling conditions applied to the hypereutectoid steel, the interlamellar spacing was observed to increase with increasing austenitising temperature and increasing isothermal transformation temperature. Through the application and experimental validation of a theoretical model (Zener and Hillert) for the calculation of the pearlite interlamellar spacing as a function of the undercooling, the growth rate of pearlite in the hypereutectoid steel was determined to be controlled by the volume diffusion of carbon in austenite during isothermal transformation in the temperature range of 550–620°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it