MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977279536 · doi:10.1145/2736084.2736089

Towards bridging online game playing and live broadcasting

2015· article· en· W1977279536 on OpenAlexaff
Ryan Shea, Di Fu, Jiangchuan Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceBridging (networking)EncoderCloud computingBroadcasting (networking)MultimediaEncoding (memory)Video gameArchitectureLive streamingComputer networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years have witnessed the emergence and growth of Cloud Gaming, where players interact with the remote game instance and receive rendered game scenes in video stream. Meanwhile, broadcasting and viewing games through live streaming platforms, e.g., Twitch.tv, have become increasingly popular. The interaction and performance of the many modules involved in this new generation of gaming and streaming platforms have yet to be closely investigated. In this paper, we present an initial experiment-based performance study, in which we profile the architecture of realworld gaming and streaming platforms, namely the Open Broadcast Software (OBS) module and its connection to the Twitch server. Our investigation shows that the recording operation can greatly increase the CPU utilization and the power consumption can increase over 60% on the game streaming computer. The use of advanced hardware encoding found on modern GPUs can greatly alleviate these performance issues. Yet, through profiling, we show that hardware encoding can introduce remarkable delays to the whole pipeline. We track this to a complicated interplay between the CPUs power saving methods and the implementation of hardware encoders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.120
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207