MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977285367 · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.033203

Coulomb explosion induced by intense ultrashort laser pulses in two-dimensional clusters

2006· article· en· W1977285367 on OpenAlexafffund
Vincent Mijoule, Laurent J. Lewis, Michel Meunier

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique MontréalRegroupement Québécois sur les Matériaux de Pointe
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsCoulomb explosionPhysicsFemtosecondLaserCluster (spacecraft)CoulombAtomic physicsDielectricWavelengthOpticsElectronIonIonizationNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phenomenon of Coulomb explosion is studied through qualitative numerical simulations of clusters irradiated with intense ultrashort laser pulses. We introduce a semiquantum approach which allows us to model two different types of materials---akin to rare gases and dielectrics---and which is appropriate for both low- and high-energy domains, i.e., the thermodynamic regime and the Coulomb explosion regime. Through a detailed study of clusters submitted to laser pulses of various intensities, we demonstrate that Coulomb explosion is the process responsible for cluster explosion under femtosecond laser pulses. We examine the differences in the dynamics of explosion of rare-gas clusters as a function of the wavelength of the incident laser radiation. For dielectric clusters, our simulations reveal a fragmented explosion mechanism; the influence of the size of the cluster is also studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207