MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977298688 · doi:10.1081/css-200058480

Effects of Water Deficit and Supplemental Irrigation on Winter Wheat Growth, Grain Yield and Quality, Nutrient Uptake, and Residual Mineral Nitrogen in Soil

2005· article· en· W1977298688 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgronomyIrrigationNutrientBiomass (ecology)NitrogenPhosphorusGrowing seasonBiologyGrain qualitySoil waterPotassiumEnvironmental scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Water deficit (WD) is a primary factor that limits winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in the Loess Plateau of China, as rainfall during the growing season is usually low and erratic in this region. Supplemental irrigation (SI) in early winter and/or early spring has been widely practiced to mitigate this problem. However, the timing at which WD and SI occur can influence grain yield and quality. A simulation pot experiment was conducted from October 1999 to June 2000 to determine the effects of WD and SI applied at different stages on winter wheat growth, grain yield and quality, nutrient uptake, and residual mineral nitrogen (N) in soil. The results showed that wheat at tillering, stem elongation, and grain‐filling growth stages was more sensitive to WD than at dormant stage. Water deficit at stem elongation or grain‐filling stage not only decreased biomass, but it also appeared to have inhibited the translocation of assimilates from the vegetative plant parts to the heads, especially when WD occurred during grain‐filling stage. Water deficit at dormant stage had no significant effect on biomass production, but it may have hindered the allocation of assimilates to the heads. Water deficit at tillering tended to increase grain harvest index but decreased biomass. Grain yield was significantly decreased (15–91%) by WD at all four growth stages. Translocation of N, phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) also appeared to have been pronouncedly impeded by WD. This inhibitory effect was more apparent at the advanced growth stages of winter wheat. Supplemental irrigation applied at dormant or grain‐filling stage increased grain yield (12% and 35%, respectively). Of the nutrients uptake, only N uptake in grain was increased (21%) when SI occurred at grain‐filling stage. Application of SI at tillering stage significantly decreased grain yield and N and P uptake in the grain, possibly due to decreased biomass and nutrient uptake in the whole plant. Supplemental irrigation at elongation stage increased biomass and N, P, and K uptake in the whole plant, but it appeared to have decreased translocation of assimilates and nutrients to the heads. Supplemental irrigation decreased or had no effect on N, P, and K concentration in grain. The main form of residual mineral N in soil was nitrate‐N, and it was markedly increased when WD was applied at all growth stages or when SI was applied at tillering stage. Supplemental irrigation at elongation or grain‐filling stage significantly decreased residual soil nitrate‐N.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it