FOUNDATION AND RESULTS OF A COSMOLOGY WITHOUT BIG BANG ON THE BASIS OF THE PROJECTIVE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After a short introduction into the Projective Unified Field Theory developed by the author during the last decades this theory is applied to a closed homogenous isotropic 2-component cosmos model, based on a mixture of a mechanical particle (urparticle) gas and a photon gas. The field equations lead to three nonlinear differential equations for the temporal course of the world radius, the scalaric world function and the mechanical energy density of the cosmos. These equations were solved numerically and evaluated in detail. The results are presented for a series of important cosmological quantities: world radius, world age, cosmological frequency shift and Hubble parameter, deceleration parameter, mechanical mass density, photon mass density, mechanical pressure, electromagnetic radiation pressure, kinetic particle temperature, electromagnetic radiation (microwave background) temperature, mechanical particle number density, photon number density, etc. Specific results of the theory are: explanation of the time dependence of the Newton gravitational constant, scalaric cosmological heat production in moving celestial bodies and the numerical value of the mass of an urparticle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it