MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

St. John's ocean technology cluster: can government make it so?

2006· article· en· W1977315118 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Public Administration · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Research Council Canada
KeywordsPolitical scienceCluster (spacecraft)Government (linguistics)GeographyPublic policyEconomyRegional scienceBusinessEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The St. John's (Newfoundland and Labrador) ocean technology cluster arises from a natural regional interest and historical economic activities in the ocean, and a more recent series of public sector investments in research and educational facilities. The St. John's cluster is compared to a more developed Finnish Maritime cluster and some recent literature on clusters and economic development. The comparison indicates that government policy towards the St. John's cluster needs to shift emphasis from research per se to a stronger industrial presence, supported by research, and a background economic environment that is broadly attractive to business and individuals. An active domestic market in primary marine activities is identified as a potential base for a stronger ocean technology industries cluster. Government actions, including continued investments in education research and infrastructure, creation of an attractive tax environment and the use of government operational requirements in ocean activities to create support industry opportunities, are recommended. Sommaire: La grappe technologique océanique de St. John's (Terre‐Neuve et Labrador) découle d'un intérêt régional naturel et d'activités économiques historiques reliées à l'océan, ainsi que d'une série récente d'investissements du secteur public dans les établissements de recherche et d'enseignement. La grappe de St. John's est comparée à un groupement maritime finnois plus développé, avec l'appui de documents récents sur les grappes et le développement économique. L‘étude indique que la politique gouvernementale à l’égard de la grappe de St. John's doit changer d'emphase et passer de la recherche en soi à une présence industrielle plus forte qui s'appuie sur la recherche et sur un climat économique de fond qui soit plus attrayant pour les entreprises et les particuliers. On estime qu'un marché national actif en activités maritimes primaires pourrait servir de base à une grappe de technologies océaniques plus solide. Des mesures gouvernementales sont recommandées, notamment des investissements continus en recherche en éducation et infrastructure, la création d'un climat fiscal attrayant et le recours à des exigences opérationnelles gouvernementales dans les activités océaniques pour créer un soutien aux opportunités dans cette industrie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it