MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977320650 · doi:10.1021/jp0106348

Coming to Grips with N−H···N Bonds. 1. Distance Relationships and Electron Density at the Bond Critical Point

2001· article· en· W1977320650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogen bondChemistryAb initioElectron densityCovalent bondCrystallographyElectronic correlationBond lengthComputational chemistryMathematicsElectronMoleculePhysicsQuantum mechanicsCrystal structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In an attempt to discover and analyze trends in distance relationships and properties at the bond critical point (BCP) in linear or near-linear N−H···N hydrogen bonds, the geometry of such bonds in a large number of suitable simple chemical species was optimized at the RHF/6-31G** level. The results for 67 of these are reported here; the geometry of 19 of them was optimized also at the MP2/6-31G** level. Correlations between the internuclear N−H, H···N, and N···N separations as well as between the N···BCP and H···BCP distances for these data sets and for different model functions are described in detail. The special case of symmetric N−H−N bonds is discussed; comparison with available experimental evidence shows that the correlation functions derived from the ab initio data have useful predictive value for crystallographic determinations involving short N−H−N bonds. Analysis of the correlation between the d (N−H) distance and the electron density ρ c at the BCP has shown that although acceptable d,ρ c representations are obtained when ρ c is fitted over the entire d (N−H) range by a single model function, significantly better fits result for both the 6-31G** and the MP2/6-31G** set when two separate regression functions of the same type are used, one for the covalent and another for the H···N bonds. The implications of these findings are discussed. The results of the correlation analysis of the curvatures λ i, the Laplacians ∇ 2 ρ c, and the kinetic energy densities at the BCP, based on the data presented in this paper, will be reported in a subsequent paper, together with some aspects of the energy of formation of the N−H···N bonds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it