MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977333242 · doi:10.1086/320356

Photometric and Spectroscopic Analysis of Cool White Dwarfs with Trigonometric Parallax Measurements

2001· article· en· W1977333242 on OpenAlex
P. Bergeron, S. K. Leggett, M. T. Ruíz

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWhite dwarfPhysicsParallaxAstrophysicsStarsPhotometry (optics)Effective temperatureMassive compact halo objectAstronomyBrown dwarfProper motion

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A detailed photometric and spectroscopic analysis of cool (Teff < ∼ 12,000 K) white dwarf stars is presented. The sample has been drawn from the Yale Parallax Catalog and from a proper-motion survey in the southern hemisphere. Optical BV RI and infrared JHK photometry, as well as spectroscopy at Hα, have been secured for a sample of 152 white dwarfs. The discovery of seven new DA white dwarfs, two new DQ white dwarfs, one new magnetic white dwarf, and three weak magnetic white dwarf candidates, is reported. Our sample also identifies 19 known or suspected double degenerates. 1 Based partially on data obtained with the UK Infrared Telescope operated by the Joint Astronomy Centre, Hilo, HI, on behalf of the UK Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council, and with the NASA Infrared Telescope

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it