MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977340876 · doi:10.1159/000197174

Effect of ACTH on Canine Gastric Mucus

2009· article· en· W1977340876 on OpenAlexaff
Graeme Dickson, A.E. Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueDigestion · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Canadian institutionsSt Mary's Hospital Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMucusEndocrinologyInternal medicineEtiologyAdrenocorticotropic hormoneStomachACTH secretionSecretionMedicineChemistryBiologyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is thought that stress, ACTH and adrenal cortical steroids may be involved in the aetiology of peptic ulceration. Previous work has shown that when ACTH is administered in physiological or therapeutic doses it does not increase gastric acid secretion. We therefore have investigated the effect of ACTH (2 u/kg body wt,) on the ‘mucus barrier’. The volume, weight and concentration of the biochemical constituents of canine gastric mucus were measured before, during and after ACTH administration. No uniform effect of ACTH was detected. Our results differ from those of other workers and the reasons for this are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.224

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigestionSame topicClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyFrench-language works237,207