Restoring stepping after spinal cord injury using intraspinal microstimulation and novel control strategies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The overall objective of this project is to develop a feedback-driven intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) system. We hypothesize that ISMS will enhance the functionality of stepping by reducing muscle fatigue and producing synergistic movements by activating neural networks in the spinal cord. In the present pilot study, the controller was tested with ISMS and external sensors (force plates, gyroscopes, and accelerometers). Cats were partially supported in a sling and bi-laterally stepped overground on a 4-m instrumented walkway. The walkway had variable friction. Limb angle was controlled to within 10° even in the presence of variable friction. Peak ground reaction forces in each limb were approximately 12% of body weight (12.5% was full load bearing in this experimental setup); rarely, the total supportive force briefly decreased to as low as 4.1%. Magnetic resonance images were acquired of the excised spinal cord and the implanted array. The majority of electrodes (75%) were implanted successfully into their target regions. This represents the first successful application of ISMS for overground walking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".