MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W197734339

Effects of Manual Phonetic Transcriptions on Recognition Accuracy of Streetnames

2002· article· en· W197734339 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Thomas Johann Bauer, Ludwig Hitzenberger, Marcus E. Hennecke

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHandwritten Text Recognition Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTranscription (linguistics)Speech recognitionPhonetic transcriptionComputer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceLinguistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In automotive systems, the accurate recognition of street- and place names as needed e.g. for speech controlled navigation systems is difficult, since many of them do not follow regular transcription rules. We report on experiments investigating the effects of correct manual transcription versus strictly automatic transcription, with regard to recognition accuracy. Our experiments showed that in case of large recognizer lexica, the recognition rate could be increased by about 10% by using a manually corrected versions of the phonetic transcriptions used for the recognition process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicHandwritten Text Recognition TechniquesFrench-language works237,207