MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977383060 · doi:10.1109/ism.2011.58

Shot Boundary Detection Using Genetic Algorithm Optimization

2011· article· en· W1977383060 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Analysis and Summarization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Waterloo
KeywordsComputer scienceMetric (unit)Genetic algorithmShot (pellet)Convergence (economics)HeuristicBoundary (topology)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPrecision and recallEdge detectionArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionImage (mathematics)Machine learningImage processingMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel method for shot boundary detection via an optimization of traditional scoring based metrics using a genetic algorithm search heuristic. The advantage of this approach is that it allows for the detection of shots without requiring the direct use of thresholds. The methodology is described using the edge-change ratio metric and applied to several test video segments from the TREC 2002 video track and contemporary television shows. The shot boundary detection results are evaluated using recall, precision and F1 metrics, which demonstrate that the proposed approach provides superior overall performance when compared to the effective edge-change ratio method. In addition, the convergence of the genetic algorithm is examined to show that the proposed method is both efficient and stable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Analysis and SummarizationFrench-language works237,207