MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977408672 · doi:10.4000/anabases.4634

Marc Aurèle épistolier : comment faire écrire un empereur romain de l’Antiquité au xvie siècle ?

2014· article· fr· W1977408672 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnabases · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance Literature and Culture
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtThe RenaissanceArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Marc Aurèle est considéré de nos jours comme le modèle de l’empereur-philosophe, mais il n’en a pas toujours été ainsi. Bien qu’il existe de nombreuses études sur l’utilisation des Pensées à la Renaissance et à l’époque moderne, peu de réflexion ont été menées sur la réception des lettres, fictives ou réelles, de l’empereur. Cette contribution vise, d’une part, à tracer un portrait général de Marc Aurèle en tant qu’épistolier, de l’Antiquité jusqu’au xvie siècle, et d’autre part, à donner quelques pistes de lecture pour la correspondance fictive créée par A. de Guevara dans son Livre doré (1528). Les conclusions soulignent l’originalité et la liberté de Guevara, dont l’œuvre à succès est un jalon important dans la construction du personnage moderne de Marc Aurèle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it