MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977424948 · doi:10.1093/imanum/drm051

Linearization of matrix polynomials expressed in polynomial bases

2008· article· en· W1977424948 on OpenAlexafffund
Amirhossein Amiraslani, Robert M. Corless, Peter Lancaster

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Numerical Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsPolynomial matrixMonomialDifference polynomialsPolynomialMatrix polynomialDegree (music)LinearizationMatrix (chemical analysis)Pure mathematicsDiscrete orthogonal polynomialsClass (philosophy)Algebra over a fieldClassical orthogonal polynomialsSymmetric polynomialOrthogonal polynomialsMathematical analysisNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns regular matrix polynomials P(λ) when represented in various polynomial bases (other than the monomials 1, λ, λ2, …). As in the monomial case, matrices of ‘companion’ form play an important part in theory and numerical practice. In particular, they are used here to construct ‘strong linearizations’ of P(λ). The paper contains three theorems concerning linearizations constructed for representations in a general class of ‘degree-graded’ polynomials, Bernstein polynomials and Lagrange polynomials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations116
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Numerical AnalysisSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207