MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977449731 · doi:10.1115/pvp2009-77524

Buckling Analysis of an Orthotropic Elliptical Toroidal Shell

2009· article· en· W1977449731 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrthotropic materialBucklingToroidShell (structure)VibrationMaterials scienceStructural engineeringParametric statisticsMathematicsFinite element methodComposite materialPhysicsEngineeringAcousticsPlasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theoretical solution is given for the linearized buckling problem of an orthotropic toroidal shell with an elliptical cross-section under external pressure loading. The solution is based on the Sanders-Budiansky shell theory, and makes use of the harmonic differential quadrature method. Theory developed earlier for the buckling of orthotropic shells of revolution, and the vibration of orthotropic elliptical toroidal shells, is incorporated in the present work. Numerical results obtained from the solution are compared with results given in the literature, and good correspondence is generally observed. A parametric study is then conducted, covering a wide range of material and geometric parameters. Regression formulas are derived, indicating the variation of the buckling pressure with the degree of orthotropy of the material. Overall, the study introduces a new tool for the buckling analysis of elliptical toroidal shells, and extends the information available for orthotropic toroidal shells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it