MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977460520 · doi:10.1002/aic.14154

Optimal operation of process plants under partial shutdown conditions

2013· article· en· W1977460520 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIChE Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShutdownDowntimeShut downProcess (computing)Production (economics)Optimal controlMathematical optimizationTransient (computer programming)Control (management)Reliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringProcess engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A systematic strategy for optimal plant operation during partial shutdowns is proposed. We consider the situation where one or more process units are shut down due to failure or maintenance but where the remaining units are able to continue operation to some degree. The goal of the strategy is to manipulate the plant degrees‐of‐freedom—during and after the shutdown—such that production is restored in a cost‐optimal fashion while meeting safety and operational constraints. Optimal control trajectories are obtained through the solution of a dynamic optimization problem. A novel multitiered optimization approach allows the prioritization of multiple competing objectives and the specification of trade‐offs between them. Uncertainty in the downtime estimate, a crucial parameter in shutdown optimization, is addressed through reoptimization. We employ a transient predictive control algorithm for implementing the computed control policy under feedback. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 59: 4151–4168, 2013

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it