MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977465015 · doi:10.2118/166882-ms

Application of 3S-Technology for the Natural Gas Processing under Arctic Conditions

2013· article· en· W1977465015 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Salavat Z. Imaev, Lev A. Bagirov, Evgeny V. Voytenkov

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Arctic and Extreme Environments Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeparator (oil production)Natural gasNozzleJoule–Thomson effectIndustrial gasPropaneBody orificeNatural-gas processingPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceAssociated petroleum gasProcess engineeringMechanical engineeringWaste managementChemistryEngineeringThermodynamicsGas turbinesPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract SuperSonic gas Separation technology (3S-technology) was designed to prepare the gas for transportation and to extract different fractions from gas, such as hydrocarbon condensate, propane-butane and ethane. The technology is based on cooling of swirling gas in supersonic Laval nozzle. Due to the implementation of high speed in the nozzle, the temperature of gas can be reduced by 70°C and more, thus ensure conditions needed for condensation and separation of heavy fractions contained in gas. A device, realizes this process, is called "3S-separator". It comprises a stationary swirl body, a supersonic nozzle and a diffuser with selection of condensed fluid. It has been proved that usage of 3S-separators instead of Joule-Thomson valves makes it possible to ensure higher operating efficiency of associated gas processing devices in any parameters. And it can reduce dew points of water and hydrocarbons of a tank gas and increase the amount of gas recoverable from unstable condensate. 3S-separators make it possible to extract target components from natural gas in wide gas input pressure range from 1.0 MPa to 16 MPa. To ensure the optimum gas temperature at 3S-separators inlet recuperative heat exchangers should be used. At present 3S-technology is successfully used by several industrial plants in Russia ("Rosneft" JSC, "Gazprom" JSC) and abroad (PetroChina Company Ltd.). The use of this technology in subsea processing plants will enable to carry out gas conditioning in accord with sales gas qualifying standards. Thus, as opposed to currently existing gas cooling technologies, based on using of expansion turbines and refrigerator sets, 3S-technology makes it possible to ensure high equipment reliability and enables to install equipment on the seabed. The more promising area – is use of 3S-technology in projects of getting a high pressure (100 and more atmospheres) sales gas. It is impossible to use conventional gas cooling technologies, because of supercritical conditions of natural gas, under which gas additives condensation is not possible at any temperatures. By ensuring high-speed gas flows in supersonic nozzles, there could be a condensation and separation of natural gas target fractions in 3S-separators, even in a high gas pressure conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.592
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Arctic and Extreme Environments Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207