MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977477287 · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpp026

Economic and economic-statistical design of a multivariate Bayesian control chart for condition-based maintenance

2010· article· en· W1977477287 on OpenAlexaff
Z. Yin, Viliam Makiš

Bibliographic record

VenueIMA Journal of Management Mathematics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicAdvanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl chartChartLibrary scienceBayesian probabilityMultivariate statisticsOperations researchEngineeringManagementHistoryComputer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligenceEconomicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It has been shown in the literature that Bayesian control charts are optimal tools for statistical process control but very few results have been published in this area. For any control chart, three control chart parameters must be specified, namely the sample size, the sampling interval and the control limit. Recently, industrial practitioners and academic researchers have increasingly recognized the cost benefits obtained by applying economically designed control charts to quality control, equipment condition monitoring and maintenance decision making. In this paper, design of a multivariate Bayesian control chart for condition-based maintenance (CBM) applications is considered using the control limit policy structure and including an observable failure state. Optimization models for the economic and economic statistical design of the multivariate Bayesian control chart for a three-state CBM model are developed and comparison results show that the multivariate Bayesian control chart performs better than the recently developed CBM chi-square chart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIMA Journal of Management MathematicsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Process MonitoringFrench-language works237,207