Les rituels du mariage dans la vallée du Haut-Richelieu : comparaison ville/campagne au XXe siècle1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les rituels du mariage sont utilisés comme des indicateurs permettant de saisir quelques modalités du changement culturel au XXe siècle. Grâce à une enquête orale menée auprès de témoins mariés au cours des périodes 1920-1940 et 1980-1995 dans la région de Saint-Jean-Iberville (Québec), il est possible d’observer la diffusion des innovations à travers l’espace social. Si l’expansion du mode de vie urbain a entraîné, de manière globale, la transformation des pratiques rituelles, certaines coutumes de la campagne ont été conservées par les familles de la ville. Plus intéressant encore, cette enquête a permis de démontrer que des pratiques paysannes anciennes, mises à l’écart pendant un certain temps, sont redécouvertes et réactualisées par les couples mariés à la fin du XXe siècle. La recherche sur les échanges culturels entre la ville et la campagne ouvre sur des perspectives inattendues.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".