MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977557010 · doi:10.1109/icacci.2014.6968596

Bilateral despeckling filter in homogeneity domain for breast ultrasound images

2014· article· en· W1977557010 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeckle patternHomogeneity (statistics)Artificial intelligenceBilateral filterHomogeneousPixelFilter (signal processing)Computer scienceSpeckle noiseComputer visionBreast ultrasoundPattern recognition (psychology)MathematicsMammographyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Breast sonograms are more effective towards differentiation of cysts from solid tumours; if they could be post-processed for minimization of speckle content without blurring of edges. The approach presented in this paper consists of a bilateral filtering in homogeneity domain so that the despeckling process do not compromises the texture and features of masses. The proposed despeckled approach decomposes the input image into homogeneous and non-homogeneous regions; which are then selectively processed using the bilateral filter. The domain filtering component is made dominant when applied to homogeneous pixels providing smoothening while the range filter dominates on the non-homogeneous pixels leading to edge preservation. Simulations carried out on breast ultrasound images depict satisfactory speckle filtering supported with improvement in values of performance parameters (PSNR, SSIM & SSI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicImage and Signal Denoising MethodsFrench-language works237,207