MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977627704 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564793

On-line estimation of inductance of flexible cables and electrode arms in an electric arc furnace by artificial neural network

2008· article· en· W1977627704 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamid Khoshkhoo, S.H.H. Sadeghi, R. Moini

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWelding Techniques and Residual Stresses
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInductanceArtificial neural networkElectrodeElectric arc furnaceVoltageArc (geometry)Line (geometry)Power (physics)EngineeringElectric arcProcess (computing)Control theory (sociology)Electronic engineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMetallurgyControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a code which uses the geometrical parameters of flexible cables and electrode arms as input, and calculates the inductance of these parts in an electrical arc furnace (EAF) by 3-D numerical method at any moment. Exact calculation of the momentarily inductance of flexible cables and electrode arms can result in improving the control system of EAF and satisfactory study of the effects of EAF on power system. Because of using numerical method, calculation of inductance is a time consuming process and cannot be used to improve the control system of EAF. So an artificial neural network (ANN) is proposed for a fast estimate of inductance of flexible cables and electrode arms. The ANN is trained using the data obtained by proposed code.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicWelding Techniques and Residual StressesFrench-language works237,207