MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977630876 · doi:10.1051/parasite/2001084267

Evidence for the existence of a proteasome in<i>Toxoplasma gondii</i>: intracellular localization and specific peptidase activities

2001· article· en· W1977630876 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueParasite · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicToxoplasma gondii Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsBiologyProteasomeToxoplasma gondiiIntracellularCytosolIntracellular parasiteIn vitroCell biologyMonoclonal antibodyMicrobiologyMolecular biologyBiochemistryEnzymeAntibodyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The proteasome is a large intracellular protein complex whose main function is proteolytic removal of damaged proteins. It has recently been shown that the proteasome has a crucial role in the pathogenesis of protozoan parasites. We attempted to characterize the proteasome of T. gondii (RH strain). In immunoblot experiments, we showed that MCP231 monoclonal antibody, directed against the human 20S proteasome, labelled homologous proteins in T. gondii with a pattern similar to that observed in mammalian cells. The study of in vitro proteolytic activities showed that chymotrypsin-like activity (the only activity obtained with archaebacteria) was present in Toxoplasma, with Km and specific activity values close to those observed with eukaryotic cells. Immunofluorescence studies showed that the Toxoplasma proteasome predominated in the cytosol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.406

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it