Double-Ridge Internal Tide Interference and Its Effect on Dissipation in Luzon Strait
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Luzon Strait between Taiwan and the Philippines features two parallel north–south-oriented ridges. The barotropic tides that propagate over these ridges cause strong internal waves and dissipation. The energy dissipation mechanisms and the role of the baroclinic wave fields in this dissipation are investigated using numerical simulations with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology general circulation model (MITgcm). The model is integrated over two-dimensional configurations along a zonal transect at 20.6°N for a maximum duration of a spring–neap cycle. Nearly all dissipation occurs at the steep ridge crests due to high-mode turbulent lee waves with horizontal scales of several kilometers and vertical scales of hundreds of meters. The spatial structure and timing of the predicted velocities and dissipation agree with observations and confirm the existence of these lee waves. The lee wave strength is greatly affected by the internal waves generated at the other ridge. When semidiurnal barotropic tides are dominant, the internal wave beams from both ridges nearly superpose after one surface reflection. The remotely generated internal waves from both ridges are therefore in phase with each other and the barotropic tides at the ridges. The barotropic-to-baroclinic energy conversion, energy flux divergence, ridge top velocities, and dissipation are stronger compared to the sum of the single east ridge and single west ridge cases. When diurnal tides are dominant, the wave fields are more out of phase and the conversion, divergence, and dissipation are less than or equal to the single ridge cases combined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".