MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Action observation and execution

2004· article· en· W1977679220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAction Observation and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsHôpital Notre-Dame
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Action (physics)NeuroscienceMedicineComputer sciencePsychologyWorld Wide WebPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is now well established that there exists a neuronal mechanism matching action perception and execution in the brain. Evidence for the existence of such a system comes primarily from studies in primates, where it has been shown that cells in premotor area F5 discharge when an individual performs a specific action and when it observes the same movement performed by others.1 In the human brain, evidence is indirect, and although no cortical recording studies have demonstrated the existence of these so-called “mirror neurons,”1 functional imaging studies have revealed activation of the likely homologue of monkey area F5 (Broca area) during action observation.2 Furthermore, magnetoencephalography3 and quantified EEG4 have shown activation of motor cortex during observation of finger movements. In this study, we report alpha rhythm patterns in functionally defined language and hand motor areas during execution and observation of simple finger movements in a patient with implanted subdural electrodes. The patient was a 19-year-old left-handed …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.729
Threshold uncertainty score0.424

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it