MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977685101 · doi:10.1037/a0030210

Promoting physical activity in preschoolers: A review of the guidelines, barriers, and facilitators for implementation of policies and practices.

2012· review· en· W1977685101 on OpenAlexaffabout
Line Tremblay, Céline Boudreau‐Larivière, Krystel Cimon-Lambert

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyPhysical activityApplied psychologyDevelopmental psychologyMedical educationMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Promoting healthy physical activity (PA) behaviours in children between the ages of 0 to 5 years has immediate impacts on the health and well-being of children and serves as a powerful strategy to prevent or minimise the occurrence of chronic diseases in later life. Although children are naturally inclined to partake in active play, their PA levels generally fall below the current Canadian PA recommendations. Given that more than 50% of Canadian children spend 6 hours or more per day in day care settings (home and centres), implementing PA interventions through careful policy development within these settings represents a strategic way to help increase PA levels in young children. Parents and early childhood educators, through their perceptions and beliefs, play an important role in fostering healthy PA behaviours in preschoolers. The purpose of this review article is to summarise the PA guidelines for young children, to discuss the effects of PA and sedentary behaviours on several aspects of children's development and functioning, to describe the barriers and facilitators of PA and sedentary behaviours in preschoolers, and to present recommendations to increase opportunities for PA in the day care setting.Keywords: preschool children, physical activity, determinants, guidelines, policiesThere is an assumption among parents, early childhood educators, and even by some researchers that young children are sufficiently active and that the amount and intensity of their natural physical activities are adequate (Alpert, Field, Goldstein, & Perry, 1990; Timmons, Nay lor & Pfeiffer, 2007). However, this assumption contradicts the trends in the increasing rates of overweight and obese children. For example, recent epidemiological data show that the percentage of Canadian children and adolescents classified as overweight or obese darted from 14% to 31% among boys, and from 14% to 25% among girls, during the past two decades, and results indicate this upward trend is likely to continue (M. S. Tremblay, Shields, Laviolette, Craig, & Janssen, 2010). Improving physical activity (PA) and nutrition behaviours of children and youth in the school setting in particular is regarded as a critical intervention strategy for enhancing population health in the long term. Although a number of studies have investigated proexercise and antiobesity initiatives implemented in primary and secondary school-based programs (see, for instance, the Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2010, Supplement 2, on school health and the references therein), there is a paucity of research aimed at determining the prevalence and effectiveness of PA programs targeting preschool children in day care settings. Given that over half of Canadian children are in some form of child care and that one quarter of these children attend day care centres (Statistics Canada, 2003), there is great potential to implement PA interventions aimed at developing healthy PA behaviours in early childhood, thereby enhancing children's health in the short term and fostering lifelong healthy PA behaviours to curtail the prevalence of chronic diseases in later life.Accordingly, the objective of this article is to review research evidence for promoting and increasing PA in preschoolers and the need for policies, preschool PA programs, as well as training and education for parents and for early childhood educators.Definitions and GuidelinesPA is defined as any physical movement resulting from skeletal muscle contraction and energy expenditure (Caspersen, Powell, & Christenson, 1985; Goran, 1998). The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology recommends that infants aged less than 1 year be physically active several times daily through interactive floorbased play, and that children aged 1 to 4 years accumulate at least 180 min of PA at any intensity throughout the day to progress toward at least 60 min of energetic play by the age of 5 years (M. S. Tremblay et al. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.067
Threshold uncertainty score0.134

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.135
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.326 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienneSame topicChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207