Promoting physical activity in preschoolers: A review of the guidelines, barriers, and facilitators for implementation of policies and practices.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Promoting healthy physical activity (PA) behaviours in children between the ages of 0 to 5 years has immediate impacts on the health and well-being of children and serves as a powerful strategy to prevent or minimise the occurrence of chronic diseases in later life. Although children are naturally inclined to partake in active play, their PA levels generally fall below the current Canadian PA recommendations. Given that more than 50% of Canadian children spend 6 hours or more per day in day care settings (home and centres), implementing PA interventions through careful policy development within these settings represents a strategic way to help increase PA levels in young children. Parents and early childhood educators, through their perceptions and beliefs, play an important role in fostering healthy PA behaviours in preschoolers. The purpose of this review article is to summarise the PA guidelines for young children, to discuss the effects of PA and sedentary behaviours on several aspects of children's development and functioning, to describe the barriers and facilitators of PA and sedentary behaviours in preschoolers, and to present recommendations to increase opportunities for PA in the day care setting.Keywords: preschool children, physical activity, determinants, guidelines, policiesThere is an assumption among parents, early childhood educators, and even by some researchers that young children are sufficiently active and that the amount and intensity of their natural physical activities are adequate (Alpert, Field, Goldstein, & Perry, 1990; Timmons, Nay lor & Pfeiffer, 2007). However, this assumption contradicts the trends in the increasing rates of overweight and obese children. For example, recent epidemiological data show that the percentage of Canadian children and adolescents classified as overweight or obese darted from 14% to 31% among boys, and from 14% to 25% among girls, during the past two decades, and results indicate this upward trend is likely to continue (M. S. Tremblay, Shields, Laviolette, Craig, & Janssen, 2010). Improving physical activity (PA) and nutrition behaviours of children and youth in the school setting in particular is regarded as a critical intervention strategy for enhancing population health in the long term. Although a number of studies have investigated proexercise and antiobesity initiatives implemented in primary and secondary school-based programs (see, for instance, the Canadian Journal of Public Health, 2010, Supplement 2, on school health and the references therein), there is a paucity of research aimed at determining the prevalence and effectiveness of PA programs targeting preschool children in day care settings. Given that over half of Canadian children are in some form of child care and that one quarter of these children attend day care centres (Statistics Canada, 2003), there is great potential to implement PA interventions aimed at developing healthy PA behaviours in early childhood, thereby enhancing children's health in the short term and fostering lifelong healthy PA behaviours to curtail the prevalence of chronic diseases in later life.Accordingly, the objective of this article is to review research evidence for promoting and increasing PA in preschoolers and the need for policies, preschool PA programs, as well as training and education for parents and for early childhood educators.Definitions and GuidelinesPA is defined as any physical movement resulting from skeletal muscle contraction and energy expenditure (Caspersen, Powell, & Christenson, 1985; Goran, 1998). The Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology recommends that infants aged less than 1 year be physically active several times daily through interactive floorbased play, and that children aged 1 to 4 years accumulate at least 180 min of PA at any intensity throughout the day to progress toward at least 60 min of energetic play by the age of 5 years (M. S. Tremblay et al. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».