MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977697955 · doi:10.3917/cips.101.0049

Etude exploratoire de facteurs psychologiques et organisationnels ayant pu contribuer à des suicides et tentatives de suicide dans le secteur industriel

2014· article· fr· W1977697955 on OpenAlex
Caroline Nicolas, Monique Séguin, Lucy Baugnet, Pascale Desrumaux

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes cahiers internationaux de psychologie sociale · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicSuicide and Self-Harm Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSuicide ideationPolitical sciencePsychologyPhilosophySuicidal ideationPoison controlMedicineSuicide preventionMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le geste suicidaire d’un salarié interroge la contribution des difficultés professionnelles. L’objectif de cette recherche était d’étudier les caractéristiques d’une organisation concernée par la suicidalité et leurs conséquences sur la santé mentale. Une étude par entretiens semi-directifs a été menée auprès de 23 cadres travaillant dans une organisation de l’industrie lourde confrontée aux gestes suicidaires de plusieurs collègues. Traités par le logiciel ALCESTE, les résultats révèlent une charge de travail lourde ainsi qu’un manque d’autonomie et de temps. Le contexte de l’entreprise est celui de restructurations successives mal accompagnées, provoquant du stress et du mal-être psychologique. Enfin, la perception d’un système d’évolution professionnelle inéquitable fait émerger des sentiments d’injustice, de manque de reconnaissance et de la souffrance psychologique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it