Retinal Morphology and Electrophysiology of Two Caprimulgiformes Birds: The Cave-Living and Nocturnal Oilbird <i>(Steatornis caripensis)</i>, and the Crepuscularly and Nocturnally Foraging Common Pauraque <i>(Nyctidromus albicollis)</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oilbirds (Steatornis caripensis) breed in the total darkness of caves and forage at night on fruits. Common pauraques (Nyctidromus albicollis) are crepuscular and nocturnal foragers on flying insects. We examined if their retinal structure and function can be correlated with their types and periods of activity. Electroretinograms (ERGs) were obtained from anesthetized birds in photopic and scotopic conditions to a wide range of light intensities, following which the retinas were processed for histological analysis. Retinal sensitivity is higher in oilbirds than in common pauraques. Under scotopic conditions with maximum flash luminance, the average (+/- 95% CI) b-wave amplitude of oilbirds is double that of common pauraques (500.4 +/- 49.8 and 245.4 +/- 40.9 microV, respectively) but, under photopic conditions, the results are the reverse (common pauraque: 69.4 +/- 18.1; oilbird: 23.0 +/- 4.4 microV). On the other hand, the retina of both species is highly rod-dominated, but rods are highly more numerous in oilbirds than in common pauraques (rods:cones ratio: 123:1 and 5:1, respectively). In oilbirds, rods are largely thinner and their outer segments are 1.0 microm in diameter and 18.6 microm in length. They are distributed over various levels in the photoreceptor layers, an arrangement known for deep-sea fishes, but so far unknown for birds. In common pauraques, rods are patchily distributed and their outer segments are 4.0 microm in diameter and 53 microm in length. The oilbirds rod thinness allows more rods per area unit, and thus to catch more photons per area unit under darkness, while the low cone number suggests that the species has poor daytime vision, which concurs with the species cavernicolous daytime habits. The lower rod number of common pauraques, compared to oilbirds, appears counterbalanced by their patchiness and longer and thicker outer segments to provide high retinal sensitivity. In addition, common pauraques also have a tapetum. These features, combined with a higher proportion of cones, show that common pauraques are well equipped for crepuscular and nocturnal foraging on flying insects in an open environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".