MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1977725697 · doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7394.831

Severe acute respiratory syndrome revisited

2003· editorial· en· W1977725697 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Maria Zambon

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2003
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarantineDiseaseMedicineTransmission (telecommunications)EpidemiologyIntensive care medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)PopulationEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

See also Papers p 850 Severe acute respiratory syndrome is an infectious disease in humans that was first recognised in south east Asia in late February 2003.1 Given the disturbing features associated with the disease—which include poorly defined pathogenesis, absence of laboratory diagnostic testing, and failure of known antimicrobial treatments—its emergence prompted the World Health Organization to issue the first global health alert for over a decade. An insidious and non-specific onset and incubation of up to 10-11 days are ingredients that favour community transmission—indeed, early epidemiology indicates spread along international air routes. However, a high proportion of illness has occurred in close contacts of affected individuals, which indicates spread through body fluids and secretions rather than aerosol routes. Despite rigorous procedures for infection control, transmission has continued in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Canada. This has resulted in yet more rigorous quarantine procedures, which have started to affect the economic life of those areas by reducing travel and trade and by inducing serious concerns in the population. What …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0190.031
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207